GOVERNMENT "TERROR WOLVES" vs.
STATE SENTINELS OF VIGILANCE
SET OFF MODERN DAY BOSTON TEA PARTY
ZERO PLUS 1245 DAY--New York, NY, Saturday, February
would think a pack of wolves roaming in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming
the same battle Americans fought when they launched the Boston
Tea Party on December 16, 1773 to refuse domination by Britain
over their individual rights?
battle Americans fought launching the Boston Tea Party
This issue of
"people's rights" over "wolves rights" is
the core of the ancient battle between government and individuals.
The scene of
the modern "Boston Tea Party" centers in Yellowstone
In 1995, fourteen
gray wolves were reintroduced into the park. They were shipped
to the famous park from Canada as part of a wildlife conservation
program attempting to keep the wolf from extinction.
personified today by a pack of wolves in Montana and Wyoming
Yellowstone had been free of the wolves. Local farmers in the
adjoining states of Wyoming, Idaho and Montana where Yellowstone
Park resides, didn't have to worry about their cattle or sheep
or other livestock being "poached" by the marauding
Species Act passed by Congress cast a federal veil of protection
over the implanted wolves. Stiff fines and prison sentences
awaited anyone who shot a wolf unless the wolf "had its
fangs" in livestock.
Since the wolves
insertion into Yellowstone in 1995, their numbers have soared
to more than 800 putting the wolf on the cusp of being "non-extinct."
To remove the
federal government from controlling the "wolf population"
and thus imposing its "black hand" on state's rights,
Montana, Idaho and Wyoming have been urged to develop their
own "wolf management" plans so the U.S. government
could extricate its control over state's rights.
Montana and Idaho
polled governmental resources and got their state plans approved
by the U.S. Wildlife Service. Wyoming took a more "American"
and Wyoming got their state plans approved by the U.S.
It refused to
recognize the U.S. government's right to dictate what is good
or not good for a state--at least, in regards to the wolves.
As far as Wyoming is concerned, "the only good wolf is
a dead one."
claim that being "anti-wolf" and "anti-government"
is like bread is butter or salsa to chips.
back with a lawsuit, contesting the right of the U.S. government
to lord over the states in the issue of wolf management. Their
biggest argument is that the wolves were not "nurtured"
back into security and safety such as the bald eagle, but rather
"forced upon" the states by implanting them.
put on in West Yellowstone
flying in citizens from Iran or Iraq and the U.S. government
forcing the states to accept them a citizens of Wyoming with
all the benefits due to a citizen. That's the black hand of
government," said one farmer.
In a world of
Terrorism, America's stated objective is to "free"
the oppressed from the "tyranny and oppression" of
regimes that "lord over" their freedom.
at the U.S. government's wolf-role as that of a Federal Terrorist.
"The U.S. has a gun to Wyoming's head and is forcing us
to swallow a dictatorial ruling that does not benefit the citizens
of this state," said one legislator. "We are making
our stand. The wolf just happens to be in the middle of the
Wyoming, all wolves are Osama bin Laden
rally for the continued protection of the wolf while farmers
whose livestock is constantly plundered by the growing packs
of wolves see government eating the viscera out of their rights
to protect their homes and land.
simply acting as Homeland Security would if a pack of Terrorists
was trying to hunt down and kill the people we loved. A wolf
around sheep or cattle has one thing on its mind--kill and eat.
We see our job as a matter of self-defense. The U.S. government
has no role in telling us we have to stand by and let our livelihoods
be threatened by wolf Terrorists," noted one Wyoming farmer.
So it goes in
today's battle with Terrorism. There are those on both sides
rooting for the victory of the other. Radical Islamics cheer
the bombing of the World Trade Center and leap with joy as a
bomb kills Americans, while on the other side of the coin each
time a Terrorist is removed from threatening others, there are
those who claim the world is just a little safer for all the
children. In Wyoming, all wolves are Osama bin Laden.
And, the U.S.
government has its own Saddam Husseins running it, trying to
strangle state's rights.
Are the citizens
of Wyoming Sentinels of State's Rights Vigilance? Or, are they
It all depends
on whose sheep or cattle are being eaten, doesn't it?
are needed to support the VigilanceVoice. Send $1
or more, either through PayPal below, or in cash or check. You can also
help by investing in a local ad in your community paper promoting the
Principles of Vigilance and how to overcome
Go to Donation Page
For More Information