Saturday--October 12, 2002—Ground
Zero Plus 395
Nobel Prize For Terrorism
Editor, New York City Combat Correspondent News
GROUND ZERO, New York
City, October 12 -- After reading the
critical, unsavory comments by the Nobel Peace Prize committee on why
President Bush did not receive the award, and instead former President
Jimmy Carter did, I took a walk in the rain.
garbage bags at
dawn in NYC
The streets of New York City at 5 a.m.
are like a battlefield, bare, except for crumpled black garbage body bags
waiting to be tossed into the crushing jaws of the garbage trucks that
prowl the streets in the pre-dawn, picking up the waste humanity creates.
Rain makes everything glisten in the
sallow street lights. The black plastic garbage body bags were
lined up, waiting to be taken, standing in almost military precision as
the ceremony of removing the old to make room for the new was
ecclesiastical rather than anti-viral.
I was unsettled. The
fresh, wet air and light drizzle cleansed the webs spinning in my mind as
I wrestled not with the fact that Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize,
or that all 166 people in his hometown headed to his house for a picnic to
celebrate, but what irked me most was the insult shot at President Bush by
the Nobel committee chairman, Gunnar Berge. After announcing
this year's winner in Oslo, Berge stated the award "should be interpreted
as a criticism of the line that the current administration has taken."
In my book, Berge was telling the
world that Jimmy Carter won the Peace Prize in retaliation against Bush--a
sad politicalization of a prize that should bestowed for no other reason
than for its principles, and not be used as bludgeon, a cat of nine tails
to whip or punish or go "nee-nee-nah-nah" in a thumb-waving,
This is its own form of Terrorism.
Such actions diminish the value of the
giving of the award, and taint the winner's honor by suggesting it was a
retaliation against a candidate, rather than an unconditional vote for the
There is little doubt in my mind that 39th
President of the United States, Jimmy Carter, is a well-deserving winner.
He's been nominated over 10 times, and acting as a statesman of peace, he
has influenced the world with his ability to step into hostile situations
and broker calm in the midst of rattling sabers. He has also
"walked in the shoes" of the poor and disenfranchised, working alongside
hundreds of others building houses, and traveled the four corners of the
earth promoting democracy and its values. He is one of
the few Presidents in history to not leap onto corporate boards after his
role as the nation's leader, or hit the lecture circuit to rake in giant
fees for just appearing at some event.
with Habitat for Humanity
When he went to broker peace between North
and South Korea in 1994 against the will of then President Bill Clinton,
he showed that he is not prone to politics but rather more concerned with
statesmanship. He has monitored elections in third-world
countries and takes his causes to the jungles, fighting tropical diseases
like guinea worm and river blindness. If, as Cervantes
said, "the proof is in the pudding," then Mr. Carter is a deserving winner
for his contributions over the past quarter century, including his 1978
efforts to stop the bloodshed in the Middle East with his Camp David
But Terrorism's shadow fell on the
award when major world newspapers like the New York Times blares its
headlines over the story with : "Nobel Peace Prize Awarded to
Carter, With Jab at Bush."
The lily's gild is tainted with
resentment, cat-calling, and excuses to lash out at another behind the
The Nobel citation itself is laced
with acidic vehemence against President Bush rather than purely extolling
the deserving virtues of Mr. Carter. The citation reads in
"In a situation currently marked by threats of the use of power,
Carter has stood by the principles that conflicts must as far as
possible be resolved through mediation and international cooperation
based on international law, respect for human rights and economic
The prosecution of
the current U.S. leadership in the Nobel Prize citation, and the
subsequent political comments by its committee, do not further peace, but
rather incite war. When one party attacks another with
criticism or admonishment it serves only to invite retaliation.
It is a slap across the face, not only to the person to whom it was
directed, but to the ultimate and constitutional principles behind the
Nobel Peace Prize itself.
The award now becomes a Nobel Prize
of Terrorism, for Terrorism's true goal is to induce Fear, Intimidation
and Complacency in those it attacks or abuses. Certainly, Mr.
Berge of the Nobel committee was using Terror Tactics when he admonished
President Bush, and Terrorized the award to Mr. Carter by inking in a
circuitous insult to the President of the Untied States when the award
should be free of inflammatory comments.
Vigilance, the overpowering of Fear,
Intimidation and Complacency, would have asked the committee to think
through its public comments in behalf of the children's children children.
Had the committee members applied the Principles of Vigilance to the award, instead of the
Principles of Terrorism, they would have had the Courage to not use it as
a political club against President Bush, they would have had the
Conviction to not be Intimidated by Bush's one-man stand against a leader
and his followers who killed nearly 100,000 of his own people with poison
gas to quell an uprising, and, they would have taken the Right Actions by
focusing solely on President Carter's peace achievements rather than
slinging the slime of Complacency by offering insults rather than solutions to
the dangers Iraq presents to the world at large.
While I may at times be
critical of the Administration's use of power to face off Iraq's future
threats, I laud President Bush for his Vigilance in stepping out of the
international crowd and challenging Hussein to a duel. By
threatening him with unlimited force, despite the cries of the
international community, Bush is pressing Hussein to the wall.
No other country has had the Courage
to challenge Hussein directly. No one in the United Nations has
stood up and shouted with a club in their hand, "Let's stop Hussein
Simultaneously, Hussein has violated
every principle of "peacekeeping" the United Nations originally
set--specifically barring UN weapons inspection teams to control his
development of "weapons of mass destruction."
In the business world, things
get done because the CEO of the company has the right to act, to make
decisions that might fly in the face of the Board of Directors.
Decisions by committee are well know to become camel humps. They
always have been, and always will be, for they require appeasement of all
the varied factions, and to appease all the points of view ends up
creating an emasculated decision. Winston Churchill was
very familiar with "appeasement,"--his worst enemy as a leader.
He was famous for saying: "Appeasement is feeding an alligator in
hopes it will eat you last."
President Bush is not into appeasing
the United Nations, or the many factions who oppose unilateral actions
against Iraq--if that's what it takes to bring Hussein into check.
Opponents of Bush's unilateralism would rather "feed the alligator."
Yet, they all know that Hussein daily is "doing something," for why else
would he kick out the UN inspection teams and hide his activities?
In addition, Hussein is a renowned Terrorist, capable of killing his own
people with chemicals, including women and children.
Alfred B. Noble
Even more ironic is the founder of
the Nobel Prize, Alfred B. Noble (1833-1896). A Swedish
chemist and engineer, Nobel is best known for inventing dynamite, the
precursor of all modern warfare weapons. Even a nuclear bomb
is an evolution of dynamite, for dynamite was an invention that allowed
one to handle a high explosives and to package them in a transportable, storageable format. A nuclear bomb's power is often cited in terms
of "tons of TNT," or another way of saying "tons of dynamite."
Or, another way of saying it, "tons of Alfred Nobel."
Many were killed when
Nobel was working on perfecting his product until the scientist finally
found a way to stabilize the explosive he wanted to blast rock for
construction purposes. But Nobel also knew the dangers of what
he had invented. He knew his product could be used to "kill and
maim" as well as "build and prosper." He created the Nobel
Prize as a mea culpa of sorts, his way of seeking absolution for being a creator of
Every suicide bomber wears his
product of destruction to their death, and the death of the innocent.
Offering a "Peace Prize" to cancel a
"Terrorism Product," seems to me to throw the "righteous indignation of
guys like Gunnar Berge out the window.
Nobel Committee Chairman
I am not swayed by his catty
In fact, the blowback from his
attacks on President Bush make me more aware that what Bush is doing is
the right thing--he's using Courage to stand up to Hussein rather than be
kowtowed by the Fear of global opinion against him. He's
applying his Convictions as a Father of Vigilance to a situation that
threatens the world at large instead of shrinking down by the Intimidation
of people like Gunner Berge or the Nobel committee who offer only talk and
no action to resolve a critical mass problem that grows more dangerous and
unstable each day in Iraq. And, President bush is taking Right
Actions rather than falling into a pit of Complacency where pundits sit
around a table and discuss humanitarian ways to resolve the crisis in Iraq
and forget the leader of the country is one of the most inhumane of all
world leaders, willing to kill his own people as a symbol of his
ruthlessness and amorality.
Then there is the Nobel Committee.
The Terrorism slingers. The
hide-behind-the-podium warriors whose namesake is responsible for the
killing and maiming of countless millions.
As a Father and Grandfather of
Vigilance, I laud President Bush's resolve to stand up to the bully of
Terrorism. Despite all the pressures that would drive him to
drop his club and be consumed in the sea of Complacency the UN is calling
for--their agreement to resolve the issue--Bush is standing tall.
He's challenging Hussein. He's telling the Beast of Terror
that even if the rest of the world is Fearful, Intimidated, and Complacent
about taking the Right Action, he's not. He's risking
worldwide sanction for his actions, and perhaps the Presidency in the next
election. And for what?
It is peculiar to me that the Nobel
Peace Prize was granted to Jimmy Carter for a lifetime of working for
peace when the award is not a "lifetime award." The award is
like an Oscar--"to those who, during the preceding year, shall have
conferred the greatest benefit on mankind."
In the "preceding year" is the key to
what the founder of the award sought his committee to honor.
What other leader in the world has stood up to the criticism of the world
to face off Terrorism? I can't think of anyone at the
moment, except President Bush.
And what gripes my butt more than
anything, is that every nation knows Saddam Hussein is "mad," capable of
mass destruction, capable of unleashing horrible weapons that make
dynamite look like an ant on an elephant's buttock. They are
just burying their heads, and fearful the United States isn't playing the
"appeasement game." They are fearful the "committee" won't
have its say in the decision, and like little children who want to be part
of the game, refuse to play unless it is by their "rules."
Peace sometimes has an expensive
price. That price is often Courage, Conviction and Right
Action in the face of Fear, Intimidation and Complacency.
Peace is, by all measures of its meaning,
the art of Vigilance. Peace is the absence of Terrorism, not
coexisting with it. Those who think that "war" is the opposite of
"peace" are misguided. Terrorism precedes all wars.
To stop it, one must police its evolution, yank out its roots before it
grows so strong it chokes all those around it. Peace cannot be
negotiated, it must be won by destroying the Terror that threatens it.
Disarmament is the key to non-violent
peace. Disarmament removes the "weapons of destruction" from the
warlords who would kill and main at will.
President Bush wants Iraq disarmed, today.
For far too many years the UN has allowed Iraq to violate its disarmament
treaties. Bush has said, "enough is enough."
If the Nobel Peace Prize was given under
non-political conditions, it would have gone to President Bush. No
one else in the world has, over the past year, proven the essence of the
award more than he--not only in his strategy to unilaterally disarm Iraq's
weapons of destruction, but in his overall "War On Terrorism."
While the world sits at
tables discussing Iraq and feeding the alligators, President
Bush is loading his gun to go hunt the Beast of Terror.
In my book, President Bush
is doing a "dynamite" job--just the kind that Alfred
Nobel would be proud of, for he's doing it as a Father of Vigilance--to
protect the children, and their children's children from the
one man who has history of killing children, and, if history
is a precursor to the future, will do it again and again and
The Nobel Prize of Terror?
It goes to Gunner Berge and the Noble committee.
To Oct 11 Story: Saddam, Osama & Dismissed
- 2004, VigilanceVoice.com, All rights reserved - a