|   
  
  
    
      | 
       
       The
      VigilanceVoice  
  VigilanceVoice.com
 Tuesday... February 12, 2002—Ground 
      Zero Plus 154
 
      
  No Security At HomeLand Security
 by
 Cliff McKenzie
 Editor, New York City Combat Correspondent News
 
              GROUND ZERO, New York City, 
      Feb 12--There was no security at the HomeLand Security Conference I 
      went to last night at New York City's Museum of Television & Radio.  
      I could have walked in with bombs strapped around me and blown up the 
      heads of some of America's and the world's media moguls.It was ironic to me that all I 
      needed to enter the small, compact auditorium and sit only three rows from 
      the stage where the powerhouses of American news were collected, was a 
      small piece of paper called a "ticket."   There were no metal 
      detectors, no police or military to form a shield of Vigilance, and, 
      certainly no concern for the welfare of the men and women who direct 
      America's news to billions of viewers.
 Governor Tom Ridge, Director of the 
      Office of Homeland Security, was the keynote attendee.   He was 
      on a video link from Washington D.C. along with Victoria Clarke, Assistant 
      Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs.
 However, sitting within spitting distance 
      of my wife and I were an array of top military and news pundits, tribal 
      leaders of America Press, men and women to whom millions upon millions 
      look toward to publish and direct the news.
 General Barry McCaffrey, with a raft of 
      military credentials including serving as a Joint Chiefs of Staff 
      assistant to General Colin Powell, sat in the first seat of the horseshoe.  
      Andrew Heyward, president of CBS, sat next to him.  Next was John 
      Miller, co-anchor of 20/20, and one of the few who had conducted a 
      rare interview with Osama bin Laden in 1998.  Dressed in an extremely 
      short skirt that looked like lingerie from Victoria Secret and flashing 
      her legs almost every time she twitched was Jane Hanson, an Emmy Award 
      winner and co-anchor for Today in New York on WNBC-4.   
      To her right was Paul Steiger, managing editor and vice president of the
      Wall Street Journal.   And finally, Mortimer Zuckerman, 
      publisher and editor in chief of U.S. News & World Report and 
      publisher of the New York Daily News.
 
        
        
          
            |    |    |  
            | Tom Ridge | Clarke |  
        
          |    |  
 |    |    |  
 |   |  
          | Zuckerman | Steiger | Hanson | Miller | Heyward | McCaffrey |  
      
  
       
                Unfortunately, the seminar was what I 
      expected--the media stroking the media about what a great job they did 
      covering the events of Nine Eleven.   I had hoped for some 
      penetrating questions by the media or audience, probing what America's 
      Homeland Security should be all about.   That would have been 
      icing on the cake.  I just got the cake--day old at that.I listened as the panel told each other 
      how they "served the public" (as though that were a new 
      mission?) and  how wonderful it was the media held 
      a "Nine Eleven Psychotherapy" show for children to assuage their pain.  
      If I didn't know any better, I would have thought they all brought big 
      hands to slap themselves on the back.  They lauded themselves as the 
      "parents of healing."   I didn't hear them one mention the 
      children's real parents, or how important it was that the mothers and 
      fathers teach healing--it was all about them.
 A couple of people eked out some quality 
      information that everyone already new.  General McCaffrey rebutted the media 
      comments that "no one really knew what was going to happen."  
      He paraded a litany of 
      intelligence and historic facts that led directly to the act of Terror on 
      September 11.  I gave him a plus for at least admitting fault in the 
      press's lack of Vigilance in digging deeper into the "footprints of 
      Terrorism" that led to Nine Eleven, but our audience was muted.
 Mort Zuckerman was the most realistic.  He talked 
      about selling papers.   He shared how the Daily News was a 
      fireman's and policeman's paper, and how they had sold over a million copies 
      per day directly after the attack, compared to three quarters of million. 
      He also stated how his "newsstand paper" (there are no subscriptions) made 
      a decision to provide press coverage for every fireman's and policeman's funeral.
 When Zuckerman first started to speak an older woman a few 
      seats from me screamed out, "Talk Louder...Talk Louder..." and cast some 
      harsh 
      reality on the symposium that was being telecast around the country.   
      She knew the panel was talking to television cameras, not people.
 
        
          |  |  
          | Tom Ridge |  
            I was let down Tom Ridge wasn't there in person; 
      I had expected to see him live.   On the screen, he was over-painted with make-up.  
      His face shined a deep 
      red allowing you to see where the makeup started and ended.   He 
      was the least communicative. His aggressive shotgun, Victoria 
      Clarke, interceded and answered the majority of comments.  Ridge, 
      however, did 
      make the comment that Vigilance was necessary.  He warned the news must be 
      broader and deeper to keep complacency from settling in over the long-haul.   His 
      commentary was drummed out by Clarke's "press secretary" bellow.  
      She constantly shifted the 
      spotlight to more of "government's policy" than "individual commentary."  
      And she bragged about how the press was allowing the government to "feed" 
      them information, praising them for not "digging" for it and maybe 
      publishing something that might be "sensitive."    I 
      twisted in my chair at the lack of response to her suggestion the "media 
      muzzle" was an accepted part of modern journalism.Only a couple of questions were fielded.  
      They came via phone line.  The panelists of course didn't answer the 
      questions as they usually don't.  Instead, they used them as a springboard to promote 
      their agenda of back slapping.  I was ready to ask why the constant 
      warnings of Russia's president went unheeded by both the press and 
      government, but I couldn't get that zinger in.
 To pass time, my wife and I wrote notes 
      back and forth during most of the seminar, commenting on the guy in front 
      of my wife with the poorly dyed hair, or Jane's short skirt and the 
      apparent wig-like look of her hair, and our desire to eat food since we were more interested in 
      dinner than the faddic communion we were listening to.
 Finally, I heard Tom Ridge softly utter the word 
      "Vigilance" two or three times in the hour and half promotion of the 
      media's "wonderful coverage."   I didn't hear the keywords 
      "fear," or "intimidation" or "complacency."   There were no 
      crowbars shoved under Tom Ridge's chair to unearth his plans for the 
      future plans such as a National ID card, or wire tapping, or military 
      deployment.   Of course, the audience (people) was not allowed to ask any questions.
 At least, I thought, I got a chance to see the 
      media without any clothes.  On television they look like Titans, but 
      in real life they squirm in their seats, check their cell phones during 
      others' comments, flash 
      their legs, try and look interested, stumble a bit before they speak, roll 
      their eyes as they try to read the teleprompters in their minds, and, 
      generally, look like the guy or gal walking down the street--normal human 
      beings who burp and fart like everyone else.    I liked 
      that.  Just real people playing the unreal stage of importance.
 But the big deal 
                  of the seminar was no security.
  As 
                  we walked out into the bitter cold of a New York Night with 
                  temperatures in the 20's, I realized we could have brought anything 
                  into the room since there had been no concern for the safety 
                  of the speakers.   Not that the panelists are any 
                  more important than any one else, but rather it seemed to me 
                  that if someone wanted to make a huge political point by capturing 
                  headlines, blowing up the media moguls would have been a sure 
                  way to secure sound bites for the next few months. That threat didn't seem to worry anyone.  
      Even at the end of the seminar three very innocuous young people stood in 
      front of the stage to keep us--the people--from talking to the Kings and 
      Queens of the news.   I could have breathed garlic breath on 
      them and they would have toppled.
 I focus my writings on three 
      themes--overcoming fear with courage, intimidation with conviction, and 
      complacency with action.  These, I believe, are the foundations 
      of Terrorism of any kind or shape--whether it is be physical or emotional.  The worst of this 
      triad, of course, 
      is complacency.
 I swam in it last night.   There was 
      complacency in everyone's comments, complacency in the screened questions, 
      and ultimate complacency for the security of the Homeland Security.
 I felt I was in the glass house.  Anyone there with a 
      rock could have broken all the windows.   Complacency allowed 
      the doors to fear and intimidation to open.  Fortunately, no 
      Terrorist or Crazy 
      entered.  While the event was boring to say the least--it 
      was also frighteningly vulnerable.  It was exposed to anyone with a gripe, a resentment, 
      or a desire for their 15 minutes of fame.
 I got the sense from Tom Ridge's comments that he 
      was pleading for all Americans to take charge of Home Security because no 
      one else really could.   He was right on.
 I personally liked him and Mort Zuckerman.  They seemed the two 
      realists in the group.
 In retrospect, had I really thought about the 
      danger of being in an insecure room with a pod of media leaders who strike 
      the headlines of the day against Terrorism, I would 
      have got up and left, not out of boredom, but for exposing my wife to the 
      potential threat of Terrorism.
 
        
          |  |  
             Complacency seduced me, as it did the 
      others--except for the lady who yelled: "Talk Louder!".  The seminar was a signpost of our lack of attention to details, a 
      sobering reminder not to count on anyone to carve a path for you through the 
      minefield of Terrorism.  Do it yourself!I was embarrassed at my own lack 
      of Vigilance.   I was throwing rocks at the media when I should 
      have known security, homeland security, is my job--everyone's job.
 Security?    It didn't exist 
      last night.
 Today?
 I guess it's up to me to watch over my 
      wife, my children, my grandchildren.  No one else seems to care 
      enough to protect themselves, let alone my family--at least the majority 
      of those present last night didn't seem to, and they represent the source 
      of our "news."
 After last night I will take my own medicine--I'll be "ready for 
      anything counting on nothing." I'll be alert to "expecting the 
      unexpected."
 I'll be Semper Vigilantes--Always Vigilant!  
      I have to be!
 
         Go 
                  To Diary--Feb.11--The 8,111 Miracle (s) Of Nine Eleven
                  
                 ©2001 
                  - 2004, VigilanceVoice.com, All rights reserved -  a ((HYYPE)) 
                  design
  |  |