| 
 
  
  
    
              |  
                    
                   THE 
                   VigilanceVoice  v Thursday 
                  -- April 11, 2002—Ground 
                  Zero Plus 212
 
 Terror And The Lollipop
 by
 Cliff McKenzie
 Editor, New York City Combat Correspondent News
 
          
                  GROUND ZERO, New York City, April 11--A new Terror, more 
                  fierce than than the Middle East crisis, splashed across the 
                  front pages of newspapers and news programs broadcast to more 
                  than 100 million television sets yesterday.It was the threat 
                  to America of the Terroristic "Nicotine Lollipop!"
 Vigilant, the Federal 
                  Drug Administration, quashed efforts by two on-line drug companies 
                  to sell the products designed to abate smoking.   
                  Besides the lollipops laced with nicotine was a lip balm whose 
                  nicotine base violated FDA approval standards.
 When I first heard 
                  the headlines on the nightly television news, I thought of some 
                  guy in an overcoat selling lollipops to kids near the elementary 
                  school.  But, as the story unfolded, I was to learn that 
                  the lollipops and lip balm were for people like myself who are 
                  addicted to the terrible habit of smoking.
 Two companies, Ashland 
                  Drug, based in Ashland Mississippi, and Bird's Hill Pharmacy 
                  of Needham, Massachusetts, were the targets of the FDAs "act 
                  of Vigilance."
  At its web site, 
                  nicotinelollipops.com, Ashland Drug has been selling a "suck 
                  'till you stop" nicotine-laced lollipop.  It was designed 
                  for smokers trying to kick the habit to use to quell the "urge 
                  to smoke."   When you get the pang to smoke, 
                  you pull out your lollipop and suck until the urge passes.  
                  The cost--$2 to $2.50 a lollipop.
 Larry Melton, owner of 
                  Ashland Drugs, was quoted in the New York Times yesterday as 
                  saying:  "I didn't know there'd be a problem."
 The problem was that the 
                  Sentinels of Vigilance hired by the FDA were more concerned 
                  with the dangers to children than to the potential life-saving 
                  results for adults.   Apparently, the labeling on 
                  the products didn't give sufficient warning to children.
 In a related act of Vigilance, 
                  the FDA also scorned and halted the sale of nicotine based lip 
                  balm.   Larry Frieders, owner of The Compounding Pharmacy, 
                  manufacturers of the lip balm, created the product to supplant 
                  the lollipops.  When a customer
  mentioned that it's hard to suck a lollipop in church, the owner 
                  started to manufacture the lip balm.  "Licking your 
                  lips can help you lick the habit," his web site advertised. Politicians were quick to leap 
                  into the middle of the Vigilance Battle.   Senator 
                  Richard Durbin, D-Ill., said:  "It is a frightening 
                  prospect that you could take a nicotine compound that has never 
                  been tested for safety, put it in a lollipop that appeals to 
                  children and sell it over the internet."
 While I am all for Vigilance 
                  to protect our children, I was also Vigilant in noticing that 
                  none of the news articles I read told about the deaths resulting 
                  from smoking, or gave kudos to the creators of the products 
                  for their attempt to try and salvage lives.
 
  Annually, according to the Center for Disease Control, over 
                  400,000 deaths are directly related to cigarette smoking--more 
                  than 276,000 men and 142,000 women.  The CDC also reports 
                  that between 1960 and 1990 deaths from lung cancer among women 
                  have increased by more than 400%--exceeding breast cancer deaths 
                  in the mid-1980's. Looking at smoking deaths from 
                  the point of view of "robbing" life from its victims, 
                  the CDC estimates that more than five million years of life 
                  is prematurely snubbed out by smoking deaths each year.
 The World Resources Institute 
                  goes a step farther.   It reports that around the 
                  world, in 1993, smoking was responsible for 3 million deaths 
                  per year.  The World Health Organization states there are 
                  about 1.1 billion smokers worldwide, or about one third of the 
                  population 15 years and older.   Eight hundred million 
                  of these are in developing countries.
 
  The WHO projects an increase from 3 million deaths annually 
                  in 1993 to 8.4 million in 2020.    Their global 
                  statistical projections show that within 25 years tobacco will 
                  surpass infectious disease as the leading threat to human health 
                  worldwide. I thought a lot about the heel 
                  of the FDA's boot squashing the drug companies attempt to sell 
                  products to help people stop smoking.   Certainly, 
                  we must be wary of anyone promoting untested drugs, and even 
                  more concerned about labeling dangerous products to keep them 
                  out of children's hands.
 However, the War On Smoking, 
                  seems to have little credence with the journalists who reported 
                  the event.
 The issue of the Terror Of Smoking 
                  was left out.
 
  When a disease as insidious as smoking takes a half million 
                  lives each year and snuffs them out without notice, one wonders 
                  whether the Terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon 
                  might have been blown out of proportion.   Some 3,000 
                  lives were prematurely extinguished in the September 11th attack 
                  compared with over 400,000 lives lost to the Terrorism of smoking 
                  each year. While we promote the heroism 
                  of the police and fire personnel who risked their lives to rescue 
                  those trapped in burning buildings, we crucify those who try 
                  and save the lives of smokers.
 Statistically, the 
                  total deaths from Nine Eleven represent 3/4 of a percent of 
                  all the yearly deaths attributed directly to smoking.
 I seek not to diminish 
                  the loss of life of those victims of the September 11th tragedy, 
                  or in any way delimit the courage and bravery of the firemen, 
                  police and emergency workers who gave their lives so others 
                  could live--but, I do wonder why a couple of businesses are 
                  being bashed to pieces by the press and government over their 
                  heroism and bravery to sell products designed to save lives.   
                  I find it a little incredulous to believe children would order 
                  nicotine lollipops or nicotine-laced lip balm off the internet.
 
                  
                    |  |    I also wonder what the 
                  comparative danger ratio is between a child sucking on a nicotine 
                  lollipop his or her parents left out in relation to the damaging 
                  impact of the second-hand smoke the child inhales from his or 
                  her parents' smoking?Of greater 
                  concern was the press's negligence in reporting the "smoking 
                  gun" facts.   While the press is quick to pull 
                  out of its research hat thousands of years of history and data 
                  on the Middle East crisis, why not contrast the Vigilance of 
                  a couple of pharmacy companies with one of America's most Terroristic 
                  enemies--smoking?  Why not alert the public the number 
                  one health threat, the single most insidious and wasteful losses 
                  of life and value to human life, results from smoking?  
                  And, those who proffer legitimate solutions to the problem need 
                  to be hoisted up the flagpole, not nailed to the cross.
 Perhaps it 
                  is the issue of what sells papers and commercials that is the 
                  real point.   If the media is supposed to be the government's 
                  watchdog, and the true Voice of the people, it would seem it 
                  missed the mark of Vigilance on this issue--at least in the 
                  stories I read.
 Vigilance is 
                  not about supporting stupidity.
 
  It is about going the extra step, looking under the rocks to 
                  find out what is right for the children of this nation and the 
                  world and making that the priority rather than just reporting 
                  the "facts" as issued by indictments or governmental 
                  warnings.   There is no Vigilance in being the lackey 
                  of government. Each year, the children 
                  of America are robbed by the Terrorists of Tobacco of  
                  5 million years of life span of their mothers, fathers, uncles, 
                  aunts, grandparents, sisters, brothers, cousins and loved ones.   
                  The killer of these lives is tobacco.
 It would seem that 
                  the weight of that loss versus the dangers of a child sucking 
                  on a nicotine lollipop or licking their lips laced with nicotine 
                  lip balm, ought to be brought to the public's attention.
  We ought to consider our real Tobacco Terrorism with a proportionate 
                  amount of Vigilance we give to Middle East Terrorists. The child who watches his 
                  or her loved ones wither and die from lung cancer suffers a 
                  Terrorism that far surpasses, or at least equals, the Terror 
                  of what happened on the Second Tuesday of September, 2001.
 I consider the companies 
                  who produced and sold the products Sentinels of Vigilance.
 Am I wrong or right?  Or, 
                  do you even care?
  Semper 
                  Vigilantes.
     
                   Go To April 10--Daffodils of Vigilance ©2001 
                  - 2004, VigilanceVoice.com, All rights reserved -  a ((HYYPE)) 
                  design
  
 |  |